Competence Formation, German Dual Vocational Education Logic, Workforce Readability and Evidence-Based Skills Development
IFP-LATAM — Institut für Berufsbildung in Lateinamerika und Karibik
This resource provides a structured orientation for ministries, TVET authorities, chambers, training institutions and implementation partners. It explains the methodology behind competence-based vocational education, workplace-oriented curriculum design, learning-location cooperation, assessment evidence, RPL, micro-credentials and workforce readability. It does not assign qualification levels, replace national qualifications or create recognition claims.
Standing disclaimer. Indicative, descriptor-based readability — not a formal EQF equivalence, an assigned level, a degree, or a recognition or employment guarantee. National qualifications remain the foundation, and decisions on levelling, recognition and admission rest with competent authorities.
Contents — the resource in five parts
The orientation resource is organised into four thematic parts and a reference section. Each part is a standalone page; use the links below to move between them.
Part 1 · Foundations of competence
Why the resource exists, the competence model (knowledge; skills; responsibility and autonomy), and the German and Swiss dual vocational education logic it draws on. Sections 1–4.
Part 2 · Work process, cooperation & instructors
Work-process orientation, learning-location cooperation between institution and workplace, and the instructor’s changing role across a learning cycle. Sections 5–7.
Part 3 · Evidence & credentials
Assessment and portfolio logic, recognition of prior learning (RPL), micro-credentials as competence signals, readiness versus readability, and descriptor-based comparison. Sections 8–12.
Part 4 · Implementation
Quality assurance in competence-based TVET, the step-by-step implementation pathway for partners, partner-specific quick-start guides, and ten practical tools and matrices. Sections 13–16.
Reference · FAQ, Glossary & Sources
Short answers to the questions partners ask most often, plain institutional definitions of the key terms, and the sources and principles behind the methodology. Sections 17–19.